I completely agree with you that Vance’s sympathetic to supportive stance towards Israel is a MAJOR red flag. However, what Republican doesn’t participate in the Zionist circle jerk? It’s shameful. The second we have a real leader who stands up to their nefarious and unAmerican agenda, they will have my (and likely millions of other American’s) full support.
I just don’t understand how the Christians in this country have found themselves captured, enslaved, and doing the bidding of Jews who think of the goyim (Christians) as subhuman.
Yea, when looking at policy it is almost like Vivek and Vance were an A/B test. Vivek called for ending aid for Israel too (on the basis of America First and ‘better for Israel’ ) and i think AIPAC said ‘no way’!
Carefully thought and well-written puece, thank you. Trump and Vance lose my vote on their pro-Zionist positions, as you say sacrificing all their other positions to make Israel ascendant. Zionism has always been bald-faced colonialism. A good question for Trump and Vance would be: "Do you support the slaughter of native Americans during the colonialist settlement of our nation?" Because thst is exactly what the warmongering Zionists have done in Palestine since the 1800s.
Thank you! I honestly think anything happening now is much worse than things that happened in the past. We KNOW right from wrong, we’ve had plenty of history lessons. Even worse, we know what’s happening as it happens! It’s a choice today and too many choose evil.
I agree that the "Israel exception" is a big red flag for Vance and how influenced he is by the Israeli lobby. It seems like politics as usual which has been a disaster for US foreign policy in the middle east.
However, I have wondered whether his strong anti-Iran stance is more bluster than he leads on. China is obviously the 800-pound gorilla threat in challenging the US hegemony in dictating the world order. Russia is second threat to the US on the world stage. If the US were to militarily focus on Iran, it'd severely hamper its ability to threaten China and Russia. Therefore, I'm leaning more towards the view that the future Trump administration's actions towards Iran are more likely to be a stronger sanctions regime and potentially limited military operations, like the Suleiman assassination.
I completely agree with you that Vance’s sympathetic to supportive stance towards Israel is a MAJOR red flag. However, what Republican doesn’t participate in the Zionist circle jerk? It’s shameful. The second we have a real leader who stands up to their nefarious and unAmerican agenda, they will have my (and likely millions of other American’s) full support.
I just don’t understand how the Christians in this country have found themselves captured, enslaved, and doing the bidding of Jews who think of the goyim (Christians) as subhuman.
Yea, when looking at policy it is almost like Vivek and Vance were an A/B test. Vivek called for ending aid for Israel too (on the basis of America First and ‘better for Israel’ ) and i think AIPAC said ‘no way’!
Carefully thought and well-written puece, thank you. Trump and Vance lose my vote on their pro-Zionist positions, as you say sacrificing all their other positions to make Israel ascendant. Zionism has always been bald-faced colonialism. A good question for Trump and Vance would be: "Do you support the slaughter of native Americans during the colonialist settlement of our nation?" Because thst is exactly what the warmongering Zionists have done in Palestine since the 1800s.
Thank you! I honestly think anything happening now is much worse than things that happened in the past. We KNOW right from wrong, we’ve had plenty of history lessons. Even worse, we know what’s happening as it happens! It’s a choice today and too many choose evil.
Solid write up. Thanks.
Thank you!
I agree that the "Israel exception" is a big red flag for Vance and how influenced he is by the Israeli lobby. It seems like politics as usual which has been a disaster for US foreign policy in the middle east.
However, I have wondered whether his strong anti-Iran stance is more bluster than he leads on. China is obviously the 800-pound gorilla threat in challenging the US hegemony in dictating the world order. Russia is second threat to the US on the world stage. If the US were to militarily focus on Iran, it'd severely hamper its ability to threaten China and Russia. Therefore, I'm leaning more towards the view that the future Trump administration's actions towards Iran are more likely to be a stronger sanctions regime and potentially limited military operations, like the Suleiman assassination.